I'm terrible at math, so I'm sorry if I'm totally wrong, but I'm assuming you just take the average:
20+28=48m
48/2=24m
On average, it may take them 24m if they work together.
The simplest interpretation would go a little something like this:
We know that we want the total donation amount to be more than $7,900, so we can set up this inequality to begin with
Where
D is the total donations raised (in dollars). How do we find D? Well, we just add up the total number of table reservations sold and the total number of single tickets sold. If we let
r stand for the number of reservation tickets and
s stand for the number of single tickets, then we have
So, the inequality representing this situation would be
And that would probably be fine for this problem.
<span><em>Footnote:</em>
</span>Of course, if this were a real-life scenario, we'd need to take some additional details into account: How many tables do we have? How many people can be seated at each table?
About 1.6 miles.
You divide the 4 by 30 to get the distance per minute and multiply it by 12.
<span>Quincy
says that 3 is a good estimate for 3.4 X 0.09, is she correct? Why?
When we say estimates meaning it is not the exact answer but close to what is
the exact.
Now, if Quincy estimated 3 as the product of 3.4 * .09, then let’s check if she
has the correct estimates.
=> 3.4 estimates is 3
=> 0.09 estimates is 0.1
Now the answer is 0.3 and not 3.
Thus, Quincy’s estimate is wrong.</span>
Answer:
Choice 3
Step-by-step explanation:
add 63 and 64 which gives you 127. Then you subtract 180 and 127. This gives you 53. 63+53+64=180. Know that the angle is 180 degrees too so you don't even have to do math.