Answer: Yes, because the helicopter manufacturer assumed the risk of the failure of the contract.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario given in the question, the subcontractor will likely prevail because the helicopter manufacturer assumed the risk of the failure of the contract.
Here, when the helicopter manufacturer entered into the contract with the subcontractor, the manufacturer was aware that the helicopters will be used in the "severely war-torn region.
In this case, the subcontractor wasn't aware of the information that the manufacturer knew of and therefore wasn't able to determine the risk that was involved in the contract.
Part A:
The number of outcomes that each of them will have to choose anyone at random is calculated below.
n = 3 x 3 = 9
This is because, Al will have 3 choices and similarly, Bill will also have three choices. These outcomes are as written below.
S = (1,1), (1,2), (1,3), (2, 1), (2,2), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 2), and (3,3)
Part B: To make the same choice, there will only be three outcomes. These are:
S = (1, 1), (2, 2) and (3, 3)
Part C: If neither of them will vote for 2, there will only be four outcomes. This is because each of them will only have two choices. These are:
S = (1, 1), (1, 3), (3, 1), and (3,3)
Answer:
-5.95%
Explanation:
A = P(1+r)^n
A is the auction price at which the sculpture was sold = $10,331,500
P is the price the sculpture was purchased = $12,417,500
n is the time interval between the year of sales and year of purchase
10,331,500 = 12,417,500(1+r)^3
(1+r)^3 = 10,331,500/12,417,500
(1+r)^3 = 0.832
1+r = (0.832)^1/3
1+r = 0.9405
r = 0.9405 - 1 = -0.0595 = -5.95%
Answer:
3. Correctly ignored a sunk cost
Explanation:
Sunk costs refer to those costs which have been incurred in the past, which are non recoverable and which have no current or future benefits.
Sunk costs are considered as irrelevant for decision making process as they do not relate to current period and have no future implications. For example, research and development expenditure incurred in the past represents a sunk cost.
In the given case, the ticket for opera was already purchased for $100 which can now neither be recovered nor transferred. Thus this cost is irrelevant for decision making as expenditure has already been made. When Shen decided to go for a party instead of the concert, Shen has correctly ignored a sunk cost.