Answer:
A and D. She can make 32 servings in total.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because if she were to mix up all of the products, she would have 16 pounds of mix in total.
5 1/8 + 4 7/8 + 6 = 16
This is choice A.
Then she must divide this by 1/2 because each serving is 1/2 pound.
16 ÷ 1/2 = 32
That is choice D.
Find the value of r(q(4)), so first you need to find the value of q(4).
q(4), this means that x = 4, so substitute/plug it into the equation to find the value of q(x) when x = 4:
q(x) = -2x - 1 Plug in 4 into "x" since x = 4
q(4) = -2(4) - 1
q(4) = -8 - 1
q(4) = -9
Now that you know the value of q(4), you can find the value of r(x) when x = q(4)
r(x) = 2x² + 1
r(q(4)) = 2(q(4))² + 1 Plug in -9 into "q(4)" since q(4) = -9
r(q(4)) = 2(-9)² + 1
r(q(4)) = 2(81) + 1
r(q(4)) = 163 163 is the value of r(q(4))
The situation can be modeled by a geometric sequence with an initial term of 284. The student population will be 104% of the prior year, so the common ratio is 1.04.
Let \displaystyle PP be the student population and \displaystyle nn be the number of years after 2013. Using the explicit formula for a geometric sequence we get
{P}_{n} =284\cdot {1.04}^{n}P
n
=284⋅1.04
n
We can find the number of years since 2013 by subtracting.
\displaystyle 2020 - 2013=72020−2013=7
We are looking for the population after 7 years. We can substitute 7 for \displaystyle nn to estimate the population in 2020.
\displaystyle {P}_{7}=284\cdot {1.04}^{7}\approx 374P
7
=284⋅1.04
7
≈374
The student population will be about 374 in 2020.
So 10% of 12=1.2 divided by
2 to get 5% which is 0.6 so because it’s increasing the amount you do $12 + 0.6 =
$12.6 if you pay online
Answer:
C. volume
Step-by-step explanation:
The response variable in this scenario would be the volume of the usable lumber. That is because this variable depends completely on the height of the cherry trees that are being measured. The higher that the cherry trees are the more volume can be expected to get from cutting these trees down. The opposite goes for trees that are smaller, they would decrease the total expected volume that will be received from the usable lumber since there would be less amount of tree to cut down.