Senator Warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. Is this a valid argument supported by accurate ev
idence? Yes; Warren supports her point by noting, "For middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." No; Warren weakens her point by claiming that the Paycheck Fairness Act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." No; Warren weakens her point by noting, "Today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes." Yes; Warren supports her point by noting, "Pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women."
No; Warren weakens her point by claiming that the Paycheck Fairness Act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." No; Warren weakens her point by noting, "Today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes." Yes; Warren supports her point by noting, "Pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women."
Explanation:
In addition to the aforementioned answer, the rhetoric that women make less simply because of discrimination, is factually inaccurate and is not supported by any data. In fact the difference in income is always drawn back to the job choices that women choose. Women are more art/literature bound for jobs whereas men choose higher paying jobs such as STEM, engineering, etc...
