The primary ethical concerns that IRBs and investigators must grapple with when designing and reviewing studies involving the use of genetic information are privacy, confidentiality, informed consent, and return of results.
People are concerned about a few ethical quandaries. Being able to obtain the information contained in the DNA structure may result in people being discriminated against when applying for jobs or insurance coverage. Another contentious issue is the possibility of selecting fetuses during pregnancy.
Genetic counseling raises unique ethical concerns about confidentiality and privacy protection. Individual information, family history, carrier status, and risk of genetic disease to self or offspring can be stigmatizing and should be kept private.
Presymptomatic testing, carrier screening, workplace genetic screening, and insurance company testing all raise serious ethical concerns. Second, the growing ability to manipulate human genotypes and phenotypes raises a slew of serious ethical concerns.
To learn more about ethical problems regarding genetic research, here
brainly.com/question/7153405
#SPJ4
? can you restate the question and name the passage plz
Answer:
hloo mum i miss u n i reallt love u....stay safe n tc
Montresor lures Fortunato by telling him he has obtained a pipe of Amontillado sherry. He mentions obtaining confirmation of the pipe's contents by inviting a fellow wine aficionado, Luchesi, for a private tasting. Not one to be made better of, Fortunato goes with Montresor to the wine cellars of the latter's house, where they wander in the catacombs. Montresor keeps giving Fortunato drinks to keep him drunk, finally arriving at a niche, where Montresor tells his friend that the Amontillado is within. Fortunato enters drunk and unsuspecting, allowing Montresor to chain him to the wall.
Montresor then proceeds to wall up the niche, entombing his friend alive. Fortunato sobers up faster than anticipated, though, and pleads with Montresor. Montresor ignores him and continues, eventually walling him in completely.
Notably though, in the story, Fortunato actually comes to the realization that this is actually what Montresor wants. Montresor doesn't want to murder Fortunato as much as he wants the psychological satisfaction of seeing and hearing him squirm as it dawns on him that he is going to die a slow death and he was so easily tricked into walking into this situation, and mocking him for it. In a final act of defiance, Fortunato refuses to play along at the end, and replaces his panic with cold silence. This silence catches Montresor off-balance, and its evident from narration that he was very confused and annoyed at being robbed of the chance to gloat properly, and even begins to feel "sick at heart" about what he is doing, because the sudden silence gives him no recourse but to actually consider the gravity of the act he is about to carry out. And even those fifty years later, there are still clear hints of Montresor being somewhat bitter about the fact Fortunato managed to outwit him at the end by taking all the fun out of his revenge.
Hope this helps :)
The correct answer is C.
Henry David Thoreau’s purpose in writing “resistance to civil government” was to explain the need to prioritize one's conscience over the dictates of laws.
In his essay, Thoreau explains that governments are typically more harmful than helpful and therefore cannot be justified. According to him, this defect could not be fixed with democracy because being a majority does not imply having the best morals and ideas.
Because of this, Thoreau calls citizens to follow their own morals and distance themselves from unfair governments. He believed that people should not dedicate themselves to eliminating evil if they did not want to, but they did have to avoid participating in it.