Answer:
62
Explanation:
I first divided 3 into 180 which is 60 because 18 divided by 3 is 6 and then you add back on that 0 getting to 60. Then for the 6, divide that by 3, which is 2 which you add to the 60 getting to 62.
I hope this helps and please don't hesitate to ask if there is anything still unclear!
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
Price ceiling:-This is show the limit of the price on maximizing value of the product which is decided by government and his imposed group for customer.
Binding:-The binding price ceiling is below the equilibrium price.
Unbinding:-The unbinding price ceiling is above equilibrium price.
Price floor:-This is show the limit of the price on lower value of the product which is decided by government and his imposed group for customer. A price floor must be higher than the price equilibrium price in order to be effective.
Binding:-The binding price floor is above the equilibrium price.
Unbinding:-The unbinding price floor is below the equilibrium price.
It is given that the equilibrium price of milk is $2.50 per gallon.
Statement 1:-This is the example of price floor and binding because minimum price of $2.30 per gallon is decided.
Statement 2:-This is the example of price floor and binding because minimum price of $3.40 per gallon is decided for gasoline.
Statement 3:-This is the example of price floor and binding because teenagers are not hired due to minimum-wage laws.
Answer:
Projects D and E should be purchased.
Explanation:
since the firm's capital structure is 60% debt and 40% equity, it can pursue up to 2 projects. Only projects D, E and F have an internal rate of return higher than the company's WACC, so project G is discarded immediately.
Since projects D and E have a higher IRR, they should be selected.
- project D: $70,000, IRR = 18%, debt = $42,000, equity = $28,000
- project E: $85,000, IRR = 15%, debt = $51,000, equity = $34,000
- total equity invested = $62,000
Answer:
The correct answer is option a and c.
Explanation:
The fed cannot control the money supply up to a great extent in the real world. This is because the feds can control the amount of required reserves that a commercial bank holds. But they cannot control the amount of excess reserves that a bank decides to hold which affects the money supply.
At the same time, the feds cannot control the amount of money that the households decide to hold as currency which also affects the money supply.
The amount of excess reserves a bank decides to hold affects the deposit-reserve ratio. While the amount of money that households decide to hold affects the currency deposit ratio. Both of these ratios affect the money supply.
Yes it is at the all the way at the end of it
