A quantitative observation is not necessarily more useful than a non-quantitative one. However, quantitative observations do allow one to find trends.
(a), the sun rising is a non-quantitative observation.
(b), knowledge of the numerical relationship between the weight on the Moon and on Earth, is a quantitative observation.
(c), watching ice float on water does not involve a measurement; therefore, it must be a qualitative observation.
(d) the fact that we know that the water pump won’t work for depths more than 34 feet makes it quantitative. Again, seeing numbers is a giveaway that it’s a quantitative <span>observation. Quantitative is where you deal with numbers.</span>
Based on the balanced chemical reaction presented above, every mole of magnesium (Mg) yields one mole of diatomic hydrogen (H2). When converted to masses, every 24.3 grams of magnesium yields 2 grams of hydrogen.
From the given, there are 20 grams of magnesium available for the reaction. With this amount, the expected yield of hydrogen is 1.646 grams. To calculate the percent yield, divide the actual yield to the hypothetical yield.
*The case is impossible because the actual yield is greater than the theoretical yield.
If we assume that there had been a typographical error and that the actual yield is 0.7 grams instead of 1.7 grams, the percent yield becomes 42.5%. Thus, the answer is letter E.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I just think it is the right answer :) Sorry if I am wrong..
