If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
Answer:
The projects which maximize Vanguard's shareholder wealth are Project A; Project B; Project D.
Explanation:
Projects which maximize the shareholder value are projects delivering Expected Returns which are higher than its risk-adjusted weighted average cost of capital (WACC).
As a result, Project A with Expected return of 15% and risk adjusted WACC of 12%; Project B with Expected return of 12% and risk adjusted WACC of 10%; Project D with Expected return of 9% and risk adjusted WACC of 8%; are the projects that maximize the shareholder's value.
On the other hand, Project C with Expected return of 11% and risk adjusted WACC of 12% is harmful to shareholder value.
Answer:
(A) cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
The type of cognitive dissonance that appears when a customer seems to regret her or his purchase is commonly known as buyer’s remorse. It can be because customers made an impulsive purchase and thus now is regretting his or her decision, or because the item that she or he purchases are expensive in nature. In addition to the price of the purchased item, other factors that causes buyer’s remorse to arise are high involvement of the purchaser, compatibility of the product purchased, and the purchaser’s goals.
Answer:
Texas will be a better option as the net pay after income tax is higher than the other cities.
Explanation:
To consider the after-tax wages we must subtract the income taxes from the salaries:
Pennsylvania after tax income: 62,000 x (1-3.07%) = 60,096.6
Texas after tax income: 64,000
New York after tax income: 68,000 x ( 1 - 6.85%) = 63,342
Answer:
The correct answer is D
Explanation:
Lifestyle is stated or expressed in both leisure and work behavior patterns and in the values, activities, opinions, attitudes, interest and allocation of income. It also states the self image of the person.
In other words, it is the way of life created through individual, society, group or culture. It comprise of patterns of interest, work, consumption and interaction that define how the person spends their time.
So, in this case, the different in the lifestyle among Craig and Justin.