Answer:
Utterson knew the house Mr. Hyde disappeared into belonged to his client Dr. Jekyll.
Explanation:
Robert Louis Stevenson's "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" revolves around the story of how a good doctor was dominated over by his alter-ego. In the end, the more dominant and dangerous personality took over the good doctor which led the latter to commit sui cide while he still has control over his sanity.
In the first chapter of the story, Enfield was telling Mr. Utterson about the horrendous incident he had encountered one late night. And in revealing how the 'monster' had compensated for his act of killing the young girl by giving a cheque, Utterson did not ask for the name on the cheque. This was because he had already known the owner of the house where Mr. Hyde, the child killer, had gone in to get the money and cheque.
Thus, the correct answer is the third option.
a) The Disney movie selected for analysis is Cinderella.
b) The social institution in such movie is marriage.
c) Sociological perspective: Feminism.
Here is the analysis:
- In Disney's Cinderella, feminism, that is, the thought of equality between sexes, is not apparent. This approach takes roots in the movie's idea of a poor girl with a miserable life who dreams about a prince who marries her and takes her to his kingdom for "salvation" and, on the other hand, the prince falls in love with her only because she is pretty. But nowadays, feminism would ask: why does she need a prince to thrive in life when she is plenty and has plenty to make the effort to achieve her own progress?
- Another point for discussion is how do they fall in love in the first place: they barely know each other but, yeah, they are in love. So, the movie shows a "superficial love", since if Cinderella wasn't pretty, he would never love her back.
- Thus, the movie encourages little girls to aspire to find the other significant one and get married with a "him", instead of showing girls how to overcome themselves and afterwards, falling in love, because only if you fall in love with yourself, you can fall for someone else.
It is a simple sentence.
A simple sentence contains one independent clause - which is the case with sentence 7. There is one subject (they) and one verb (rule), which means that it is a simple sentence (because of one verb only). A dependent clause wouldn't be able to stand on its own, and sentence 7 obviously can, which is why it is not dependent.
Answer to Question 18:
I believe the answer is B: he never ate vegetables, but now he loves them.
Answer to Question 19:
I believe the answer is B: beautiful while also being unique.
Explanation to Question 18:
The <em>ate </em>in the sentence clarifies that he used to never eat vegetables, but now he does.
Explanation to Question 19:
<em>Unique </em>in the sentence is clarifying that the uniqueness of the home's furniture is positive, so it's not beautiful or unique; the furniture is beautiful and unique at the same time.