Answer:
Cash provided by operating activities =$28,700.
Explanation:
Look at attachment for step by step guide.
The answer to the question is Semiannually
This means that a final Incident Response plan should be tested a minimum of two times every year by performing a structured walk-through test at least, and when possible, perform a more realistic type of test.
Answer:
d. Choose Option B because it has a higher NPV
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
For Option A:
Investment = $10 million
Present Value of cash flows = Cash flow ÷ Discounting rate
= $2 ÷ 10%
= $20 million
Now
NPV = $20 - $10
= $10 million
We know that
IRR is the rate at which the NPV will be zero
So, 2 ÷ r - 10 = 0
r = 20%
For Option B:
Investment = $50 million
Present Value of cash flows = $6.5 ÷ 10% = $65 million
NPV = $65 - $50 = $15 million
we know that
IRR is the rate at which the NPV will be zero
So, 6.5÷ r -50 = 0
r = 13%
Based on NPV, Option B should be selected as it contains higher NPV as compared to option A.
However, Based on IRR, Option A should be chosen as it contains higher IRR and a higher IRR represent a higher profit percentage
Answer:
a. debit Notes Receivable for the face value of the note
Explanation:
The note will generate interest over time, but at the moment of receiving the note, <u>it hasn't accrued any interest,</u> so we have to only <u>record for the value of the note today.</u>
Also this note represent the right to claim cash from the person who sign the note, so <u>it is an asset for the company.</u>
Asset <u>increase from debit side</u>, so the Note Receivable will be debited.
Here is the answer that completes the statement above.
Regarding the situation of Toby who runs a small deli downtown, if he is already maximizing his profits, therefore, we can say that the number or amount of delis will soon increase or rise. Hope this answers your question.