Answer:
The carrying capacity is 12. There can't be over 12 because they will die from starvation.
Hope This Helps!
Answer:
I believe that the best answer to the question: How is it that the same tertiary structure of a protein can result from different primary structures? Would be, B: None of the above.
Explanation:
This is probably the best choice from all the ones in the list simply because due to specific portions of the other answers they make the statement incorrect.
It will help to remember this: proteins have primary, secondary and tertiary structures because when they first emerge from the trascription process from mRNA, they are a simple string where the most important factor is the sequence of aminoacids. It is this sequence which will determine the folding factor. However, there is another factor that must always be kept in mind; environmental factors (temperature, medium where the protein is, as well as location where it is being produced) will also play a role on how the folding will happen and on which of the aminoacids.
The evolvement of a protein chain from its primary, to its secondary and then tertiary shape (the only functional, or known as native state) depends on which of the aminoacids in a specific sequence has the necessary elements to form bonds (hydrogen bonds) with others and thus start the folding process.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
because of osmosis as it goes from low to high
<span>Anton van Leeuwenhoek learned to grind lenses ( 1668) and develop simple microscopes.
</span>
Leeuwenhoek heated the middle of a small soda glass rod , over a flame. On pulling apart the two ends, the glass rod elongated into thin whiskers .
Heating the end of this whisker resulted in a tiny high quality glass sphere. These glass spheres then became the lens of his microscope, with the smallest sphere providing the greatest magnification.
Leeuwenhoek's designs were very basic. The body of the microscope was a single lens mounted in a tiny hole on a brass plate. The specimen was then mounted on a sharp point that sticks up in front of the lens. It's position and focus could be adjusted by turning the two screws.
The entire instrument was about 3 to 4 inches long and had to be held up close to the eye, requiring good lighting and great patience to use.
The probability that a homozygous recessive individual would be producing a dominant allele would be 0%. If expressed as a percentage, this is because the individual does not even have the possible allele in its genotype for whatever trait or feature that the protein codes for.