Answer:
1.2×10²³ atoms.
Explanation:
Data obtained from the question include:
Mole of propanone = 0.20 mole
Number of atoms of propanone =.?
From Avogadro's hypothesis, we understood that 1 mole of any substance contains 6.022×10²³ atoms.
This implies that 1 mole of propanone also contains 6.022×10²³ atoms.
Thus, we can obtain the number of atoms in 0.20 mole of propanone as illustrated below:
1 mole of propanone contains 6.022×10²³ atoms.
Therefore, 0.20 mole of propanone will contain = 0.2 × 6.022×10²³ = 1.2×10²³ atoms.
Thus, 0.20 mole of propanone contain
1.2×10²³ atoms.
Answer:
λ = 6.5604 x 1016 nm
Explanation:
Given Data:
The energy of the red line in Hydrogen Spectra = 3.03 x 10-19
Formula to calculate Wave length
E= hv
Where E is Energy
h is Planks Constant = 6.626 x 10–34 J s
v is frequency
In turn
v= c/ λ
where c is speed of light = 3.00 x 108 m s–1
λ is wavelength = to find
Solution:
Formula to be Used:
E= hv………………………… (1)
Putting the value v in equation 1
E= h c/ λ…………………… (2)
Put the value in equation 2
3.03 x 10-19 J = (6.626 x 10–34 J s) x (3.00 x 108 m s–1) / λ ……………………….(3)
By rearranging equation 3
λ = (6.626 x 10–34 J s) x (3.00 x 108 m s–1) /3.03 x 10-19 J
λ = 6.5604 x 107 m
The answer is in “m”
So we have to convert it into nm
So for this to convert “m” to “nm” multiply the answer with 109
λ = 6.5604 x 107 x 109
λ = 6.5604 x 1016 nm
<span>The particles are far apart from each other.</span>
Yes it could, but you'd have to set up the process very carefully.
I see two major challenges right away:
1). Displacement of water would not be a wise method, since rock salt
is soluble (dissolves) in water. So as soon as you start lowering it into
your graduated cylinder full of water, its volume would immediately start
to decrease. If you lowered it slowly enough, you might even measure
a volume close to zero, and when you pulled the string back out of the
water, there might be nothing left on the end of it.
So you would have to choose some other fluid besides water ... one in
which rock salt doesn't dissolve. I don't know right now what that could
be. You'd have to shop around and find one.
2). Whatever fluid you did choose, it would also have to be less dense
than rock salt. If it's more dense, then the rock salt just floats in it, and
never goes all the way under. If that happens, then you have a tough
time measuring the total volume of the lump.
So the displacement method could perhaps be used, in principle, but
it would not be easy.
