Answer:
The answer would be
Explanation:
You can specify which users or groups can access, view, or modify a shared folder and its contents. The access permissions of shared folders, as well as individual files and subfolders, can be customized for each user or group.
Share permissions manage access to folders shared over a network; they don’t apply to users who log on locally. Share permissions apply to all files and folders in the share; you cannot granularly control access to subfolders or objects on a share. You can specify the number of users who are allowed to access the shared folder.
There are three types of share permissions: Full Control, Change and Read. You can set each of them to “Deny” or “Allow” to control access to shared folders or drives:
* Read — Users can view file and subfolder names, read data in files, and run programs. By default, the “Everyone” group is assigned “Read” permissions.
* Change — Users can do everything allowed by the “Read” permission, as well as add files and subfolders, change data in files, and delete subfolders and files. This permission is not assigned by default.
* Full Control — Users can do everything allowed by the “Read” and “Change” permissions, and they can also change permissions for NTFS files and folders only. By default, the “Administrators” group is granted “Full Control” permissions.
Answer:
Mio's foreign earned income exclusion is $99,960
Explanation:
The calculation of the Mio's foreign earned income exclusion is given below:
The foreign earned income exclusion limit for 2020 is $107,600
Now the foreign earned income exclusion depend on days equivalent to
= Foreign earned income exclusion limit × (2020 days ÷ total number of days in a year)
= $107,600 × (340 days ÷ 366 days)
= $99,960
Hence, Mio's foreign earned income exclusion is $99,960
The invention of (cash register) addressed two challenges faced by department store owners in the late 19th century: creating detailed sales records and embezzlement by employees.
Answer:
Period Bonds Interest Cash Increase in Bonds payable
Payable Expenses Paid Bonds payable at the end
2018 583352 23334.08 18000 5334.08 588686.1
2019 588686.1 23547.44 18000 5547.44 594233.5
2020 594233.5 23766.48 18000 5766.48 600000
Journal entries
<u>Jan 01 2018</u>
Cash account Dr $583352
Discount on Bonds Payable Dr $16648
Bonds payable Cr $600000
<u>Dec 31 2018</u>
Interest expense Dr $23334.08
Cash account Cr $18000
Discount on bonds Payable Cr $5334.08
<u>Dec 31 2019</u>
Interest expense Dr $23547.44
Cash account Cr $18000
Discount on bonds Payable Cr $5547.44
<u>Dec 31 2020</u>
Interest expense Dr 23766.48
Cash account Cr $18000
Discount on bonds Payable Cr $5766.48
<u>Dec 31 2020</u>
Bonds Payable Dr $600000
Cash account Cr $600000
<u>01.01.2020</u> (Redemption at 101)
Bonds Payable Dr $600000
Loss on redemption of bonds Dr $11766.48
Cash account (600000*101%) Cr $606000
Discount on bonds payable Cr $5766.48
Answer:
The appellate court ruled in favor of Bad Frog (lower court had ruled in favor of the New York State Liquor Authority) arguing that the label did not portray or concern an unlawful activity, and the state's authority couldn't prove it was protecting children from vulgar images.
The initial problem related to the repeated denial of the New York State Liquor Authority to approve Bad Frog's label even after the company had changed the label to make it less obscene. Bad Frog sued the New York State Liquor Authority and the District Court ruled against them. Then Bad Frog appealed and won.