Answer:
(A) it will affect the GDP Deflator.
(B) it will affect both the GDP deflator and the CPI
Explanation:
(A) The increase in prices of imports increase real GDP and also the GDP deflator as now the US will purchase less of these cars from china and therefore there will be less imports of this car from china, people will prefer buying local inexpensive cars which will in turn increase the GDP even more than before so therefore this scenario only affects the GDP deflator only as the formula for real GDP is the sum of consumption spending, government spending,government saving( investment) and (exports minus imports) so the less imports we get the more real GDP we get in the US economy.
(B) This will affect both GDP deflator and CPI because firstly this will touch on the exports which will increase and bring in more revenue for the US therefore increasing real GDP because the prices of the fishing product has decreased which will cause the US economy to increase. it will also affect the CPI because now prices of this product have fell therefore the CPI is also going to fall probably causing a deflation.
Answer: True
Explanation:
To understand organizational markets, one must first realize that there are three main types of them: Industrial, reseller and government.
Industrial markets enable businesses to transact with each other. They trade raw materials and other goods to each other and process them to finished goods.
The reseller market does not involve any processing but rather firms buying from one and selling to another as middlemen.
The last market is the Government market. Any arm of government that purchases goods and services fall here including at local, state or federal level.
Answer: A way to earn money.
Explanation: There are many other ways to earn, like selling drugs, or robbing a elderly woman who tries to hit you with her cheap shoulder bag. There are many ways.
Answer:
It's best to invest in the second economy
Explanation:
The question does not provide information on the hypothetical economic expectations of the two economies, but as a risk-averse investor, it's a better idea to try to "spread" the risk instead of concentrating it.
In the first economy, conditions might or might not be good. If they are good, returns will be extraordinary because all stocks will provide good returns, but if conditions take a turn for the worse, all stocks prices will fall and the financial consequences will be catastrophic.
In the second economy, results might never be as good as in the first economy, but they also will not ever be as bad. The risk is spread between various stocks, and while some may fall in price, others will rise, and viceversa. For a risk-adverse investor, this a far better option.
<span>It should be laid out like this example:(November 10, 2015)</span>