Answer:
future worth:
project A 11,615.26
project B 12,139.18
It should choose project B as their future value is greater
IRR of project A: 13.54%
We should remember that the IRR is the rate at which the net value is zero thus, equals the inflow with the cash outlay
It is calculate with excel or financial calculator due to the complex of the formula.
Explanation:
Project A
We calculate the future value of the cash flow per year and cost as we are asked for future value. The salvage value is already at the end of the project life so we don't adjust it.
Revenues future value
C 15,000
time 8
rate 0.12
FV $184,495.3970
Expenses future value
C 3,000
time 10
rate 0.12
FV $52,646.2052
Cost future value
Principal 40,000.00
time 10.00
rate 0.12000
Amount 124,233.93
Net future worth:
-124,233.93 cost - 52,646.21 expenses + 184,495.40 revenues + 4,000 salvage value
future worth 11,615.26
Project B
cost:
Principal 60,000.00
time 10.00
rate 0.12000
Amount 186,350.89
expenses 52,646.21 (same as previous)
revenues
C 24,000
time 7
rate 0.12
FV $242,136.2815
TOTAL
242,136.28 + 9,000 - 52,646.21 - 186,350.89 = 12,139.18
Internal rate of return of project A
we write the time and cash flow for each period.
Time Cash flow
0 -40,000
1 -3,000
2 -3,000
3 12,000
4 12,000
5 12,000
6 12,000
7 12,000
8 12,000
9 12,000
10 16,000
IRR 13.54%
Then we write on excel the function =IRR(select the cashflow)
and we got the IRR of the project
There you go. let me know if this is right
Answer:
matrix organizational structure
Explanation:
When a company works under a matrix organizational structure, specialists from different parts of the organization are brought together on a temporary basis to work on specific projects. It is common for employees to report to both a functional manager (traditional manager) and a product manager (project manager).
Answer:
Option A. It will lower its costs through economies of scale.
Explanation:
The reason is that the sales of both of the companies will increase and cost can be controlled by integration of departments like finance department, distribution department, etc. This will decrease the cost of the product which will be because of higher sales and cost benefits due to integration of department and this higher sales increases the production which reduces the cost. So the option A is correct.
Answer:
Fred's seniority is a good defense for Grange
Explanation:
Based on the situation at hand and the details provided within the question it can be said that in Ellen’s suit against Grange for discrimination, most likely Fred's seniority is a good defense for Grange. Since Fred has been working at Grange Storage for a long time then Fred also has a right to claim that opening for himself.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.