Answer:
The incomplete part of the question is "Using a cap-and-trade system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $1 million per year. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution? If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction will be $1 million per year." The full question is attched as picture as well
1) Tradable permit system
Then lower MAC firm will abate the all pollution units
Then as MAC1 = $250, MAC2 = $275
Firm 1 = Consolidated electric
Firm 2 = Commonwealth utility
Then 1 will sell all permits to 2, at a price between $250 & $275.
So total cost of abatement of 20 units = MAC1 * 20
= $250 * 20 Unit
= $5,000
2) Non-tradable permits
Total cost = MC1*10 + MC2*10
= $2,500 + $2,750
= $5,250
Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
Case 1
Production cost of goods
Work is under way, start 1510
Material direct 9780
Labor Direct 5950
Overhead production 8870
Total cost of production 24600
Total work costs under way 26110
Less: Finishing job in phase 8140
Generated cost of goods 17970
<span>a. </span>No. Since the good that I am selling
is inelastic considering the elasticity given in and outside Texas, having a
lower price than non-Texan gas stations would have less impact on the quantity
demanded.
<span>b. </span>The profit-maximizing price to
charge a Texan for a car wash would be $12.
<span>c. </span><span>The profit-maximizing price to
charge a Californian for a car wash would be $18. </span>
<span>(See attached for the calculations.)</span>
Answer:
the equity beta of the firm is 1.134
Explanation:
The computation of the equity beta is shown below:
Equity beta is
= Asset beta × [1 + (1 - tax rate) × Debt-equity ratio]
= 0.9 × [1 + (1 - 0.35) × 0.4]
= 0 9 × 1.26
= 1.134
Hence, the equity beta of the firm is 1.134
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Your answer would be severity (: