10 1/18...........................................
...................................................
1700÷40= 42.5
step one: you divide 40 into 1700
step two: you find the closest number that goes into 1700 which is 4 so 40×4= 160
step three: then you subtract 1700 from 160 and you'll get 100
step four: then you'll find the closest number that goes into a 100 and that will be 2 so 40×2=80
step 5: you'll then subtract 100 from 80 and you'll get 20
step 6: you when then add a decimal and add an extra 0 to 1700 so you will now have 17000 you will bring down the 0 to make 20 into 200 and you will find the closest number that will go into 200 which will be 5 cause 40×5= 200 so you're answer will be 42.5units
Answer:
quadrant ll
Step-by-step explanation:
A point on the y-axis will always have an x-coordinate of zero. Instructions: In the figure above, the point with coordinates (4,2) is located in quadrant I. The point with coordinates (-3,4) is located in quadrant II.
Answer:
Rolling case achieves greater height than sliding case
Step-by-step explanation:
For sliding ball:
- When balls slides up the ramp the kinetic energy is converted to gravitational potential energy.
- We have frictionless ramp, hence no loss due to friction.So the entire kinetic energy is converted into potential energy.
- The ball slides it only has translational kinetic energy as follows:
ΔK.E = ΔP.E
0.5*m*v^2 = m*g*h
h = 0.5v^2 / g
For rolling ball:
- Its the same as the previous case but only difference is that there are two forms of kinetic energy translational and rotational. Thus the energy balance is:
ΔK.E = ΔP.E
0.5*m*v^2 + 0.5*I*w^2 = m*g*h
- Where I: moment of inertia of spherical ball = 2/5 *m*r^2
w: Angular speed = v / r
0.5*m*v^2 + 0.2*m*v^2 = m*g*h
0.7v^2 = g*h
h = 0.7v^2 / g
- From both results we see that 0.7v^2/g for rolling case is greater than 0.5v^2/g sliding case.
What?wait a minute I think it’s 365
