Answer:
B. it allows entrepreneurs to profit from their ideas.
Explanation:
Intellectual properties are valuable ideas, innovations, and creations to a business. They are intangible assets that give a business its competitive advantage. Protecting intellectual properties ensure an individual or entity reaps the full benefits of the inventions and creations.
Protecting intellectual properties safeguards a company's ideas from being exploited by its competitors for commercial gains. It gives a business the right to exclusively profits from its innovations. Protecting intellectual properties encourages research and development as entrepreneurs are guaranteed to benefit from their creations.
Answer:
$2,033
Explanation:
The computation of the terminal value at the end of the year 2 is shown below:
= {Free cash flow of the firm × (1 + growth rate) × (1 + growth rate) + (1+ growth rate)} ÷ (WACC - growth rate)
= {($80 million × (1 + 0.10) × (1 + 0.10) × (1 + 0.05)} ÷ (10% - 5)
= $101.64 ÷ 0.05
= $2,033
We simply applied the above formula so that the Terminal value could arrive
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": The customer service center.
Explanation:
The customer service center is a web attractor that allows customers to self-assist in basic operations or by accessing basic data of their own. Balances, statements, payment history, and recent transactions are among the information consumers can access to in a blink of an eye thanks to this online data feed. In case a piece of information is unclear, this feed usually has direct access to reach a customer service representative for an explanation.
Answer:
Joel is behaving in a totally unprofessional & unethical manner
Explanation:
As assistant controller, Joel Kimmel's job specification & responsibility includes financial statement preparation & combination, putting of internal controls in place, detailed analysis & reporting of cost variance, acts as the go-between with external auditors amongst other such responsibilities.
As such, when Joel discovered the cost discrepancy during the reconciliation, it was actually his responsibility to call the bank's attention to the variance. This is something that clearly falls under his job specification & can be considered as neglect of duty. Joel's decision defeats the very purpose of bank reconciliation, which is to correct any such discrepancy & to the ensure the rectification of transactions. Most importantly, the decision Joel plans to take is very unethical & is against standard accounting practices
We can therefore, say that Joel's decision is thoroughly unethical & unprofessional
Answer:
John is correct but Lynn isn't
Explanation:
John is correct because he left his coat with the coatroom attendant under the premise that it would be properly looked after and returned to him when he was done having lunch at the restaurant. However, Lynn just left her coat lying around under no ones care or supervision, there wasn't a predetermined agreement that anyone would be responsible for watching it on her behalf, therefore I don't think she is has the right to sue.
