Answer:
Trees and birds have a commensalism relationship. The birds benefit from having a place to build their nests, while the trees are unharmed and not impacted by the bird’s presence.
Explanation:
The snakehead could unreservedly eat little fish and scavangers, so that would evacuate/diminish the predator for zooplankton and phytoplankton. So zooplankton and phytoplankton populace would increment while little fish and scavanger populace would diminish. Presently if little fish and shellfish populace diminishes, their predators would have bring down sustenance, so vast fish pop. would diminish. On the off chance that vast fish pop. diminishes, their predators will have less nourishment thus the number of inhabitants in well evolved creatures will somewhat drop, however not by much, since they can feast upon zooplankton.
So at last, just the phytoplankton populace would increment while everything else diminishes.
Biotic and abiotic limitations determine the carrying capacity of a population.
<h3>What is carrying capacity?</h3>
Carrying capacity is defined as the maximum number of individuals that an environment can sustain without destroying the environment. It is determined by various factors such as food availability, water, and space.
So we can conclude that Biotic and abiotic limitations determine the carrying capacity of a population.
Learn more about capacity here:brainly.com/question/1464531
#SPJ3