An electronic instrument that measures power and frequency of electronic signals is the

Physics

1 answer:

Mrac [35]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Measures power and frequency would be a spectrum analyser and power is probably the wrong word . Amplitude would be better .

Explanation:

You might be interested in

If Star A is magnitude 1.0 and Star B is magnitude 9.6 , which is brighter and by what factor?

ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

Star A is brighter than Star B by a factor of 2754.22

Explanation:

Lets assume,

the magnitude of star A = m₁ = 1

the magnitude of star B = m₂ = 9.6

the apparent brightness of star A and star B are b₁ and b₂ respectively

Then, relation between the difference of magnitudes and apparent brightness of two stars are related as give below: $(m_{2} - m_{1}) = 2.5\log_{10}(b_{1}/b_{2})$

The current magnitude scale followed was formalized by Sir Norman Pogson in 1856. On this scale a magnitude 1 star is 2.512 times brighter than magnitude 2 star. A magnitude 2 star is 2.512 time brighter than a magnitude 3 star. That means a magnitude 1 star is (2.512x2.512) brighter than magnitude 3 bright star.

We need to find the factor by which star A is brighter than star B. Using the equation given above,

$(9.6 - 1) = 2.5\log_{10}(b_{1}/b_{2})$

$\frac{8.6}{2.5} = \log_{10}(b_{1}/b_{2})$

$\log_{10}(b_{1}/b_{2}) = 3.44$

Thus,

$(b_{1}/b_{2}) = 2754.22$

It means star A is 2754.22 time brighter than Star B.

3 0

2 years ago

Why are fossil fuels considered nonrenewable resources if they are still forming beneath the surface today?

AleksandrR [38]

B is the answer because it takes millions of years to form these fossil fuels and everyday we use way more than we can find we may have a surplus for now but we may run out sooner than some think

7 0

2 years ago

A small package is attached to a helium-filled balloon rising at 2 m/s. The package drops from the balloon when it is 14 meters

scZoUnD [109]

I would assume air resistance is negligible and so the acceleration of the package would be approximately 9.81 m/s².

Taking downwards as positive, use v²=u²+2as.
v²=(-2)²+2(9.81)(14)
v=16.7 m/s

4 0

2 years ago

Determine the gravitational field 300km above the surface of the earth. How does this compare to the field on the earth's surfac

Serjik [45]

The strength of the gravitational field is given by:
$g= \frac{GM}{r^2}$
where
G is the gravitational constant
M is the Earth's mass
r is the distance measured from the centre of the planet.

In our problem, we are located at 300 km above the surface. Since the Earth radius is R=6370 km, the distance from the Earth's center is:
$r=R+h=6370 km+300 km=6670 km= 6.67 \cdot 10^{6} m$

And now we can use the previous equation to calculate the field strength at that altitude:
$g= \frac{GM}{r^2}= \frac{(6.67 \cdot 10^{-11} m^3 kg^{-1} s^{-2})(5.97 \cdot 10^{24} kg)}{(6.67 \cdot 10^6 m)^2} = 8.95 m/s^2$

And we can see this value is a bit less than the gravitational strength at the surface, which is $g_s = 9.81 m/s^2$ .