The two excerpts in the passage that supports the claim that Paine believed the cost of the colonists' struggle against the British was well worth the outcome are:
- "the children will criticize his cowardice, who shrinks back at a time when a little might have saved the whole, and made them happy"
- "say not that thousands are gone, turn out your tens of thousands"
<h3>What is a Supporting Detail?</h3>
This refers to the use of evidence to validate a claim to show whether it is true or not.
Hence, we can see that from the given text, there is the narration about the thought of Paine, one of the founding fathers about the struggle is worth the outcome, and the supporting details are shown above.
Read more about supporting details here:
brainly.com/question/11912847
#SPJ1
It's because some people think that the the teachers they have might act like their second mother.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The statement that Majed was six years old when his family moved to Jeddah is false.
In the first sentence of the passage, we are told that Majed was born in Jeddah (<em>Majed Abdullah was born in Jeddah on</em>...). In the second sentence, we are told that, when he was six years old, his family moved to Riyadh (<em>When he was six, his father got a job as a coach of the Al-
Nassr youth team and the family moved to Riyadh</em>). If the statement contained information about his family moving to Riyadh, it would've been correct.
The answer for the given question above would be the first option. The excerpt from Beowulf “The Battle With the Dragon” that *most *plainly casts the dragon as the tale’s antagonist is this: <span> “Vomiting fire and smoke, the dragon/Burned down their homes.” Hope this helps.</span>
"<span>c. to add interest, complications, and intrigue" is the best option from the list, since subplots add a level of complication that makes both the story and the characters more interesting. </span>