Answer:
The correct answer is c. human movement that is used to communicate messages between people.
Explanation:
Body posture comes under non-verbal communication. Most of the time people communicate non-verbally than verbally by facial expression, body posture, appearance, and gesture.
Body posture says a lot of things about a person like if a person's body posture is straight that shows that the person is focused, interested and confident but if a person has stooped posture while sitting or standing gives a message that the person is bored and lack self-confidence.
Body posture also affects the health and personality of any individual. Day to day lifestyle of modern life is hugely responsible for people's bad body posture and health issues.
Therefore, the correct answer is c. human movement that is used to communicate messages between people.
<span>R group (or side chain) is an organic component of amino acids that is unique to each amino acid. </span> <span>Three of the amino acids have basic side chains at neutral pH: arginine (Arg), lysine (Lys), and histidine (His). Their side chains contain nitrogen and resemble ammonia, which is a base and their pKa's are high enough that they tend to bind protons, (positive charge). Aspartic acid or aspartate (Asp) and glutamic acid or glutamate (Glu) are acidic amino acids because their side chains have carboxylic acid groups whose pKa's are low enough to lose protons, (negatively charged). The non-polar amino acids contain uncharged functional groups<span> at physiological pH and are incapable of participating in hydrogen bonding. </span></span>
That is called an insertion mutation which is a type of a frameshift mutation
depending on where you put the extra nucleotide, the amino acid sequence may look different.
Because since developing countries are still growing, when they finally get to the level of some more advanced countries the country as a whole feels a "greater growth"
The best answer is: introducing exotic species into
<span>
new environments. This can be actually bad, as new species can actually reduce the biodiversity in the environments to which they're introduced</span> , such when cats hunt indigenous birds.
I was a bit thinking about the last option too: making sure local people benefit from conservation efforts.
This is not one of the classical goals of the conservation efforts, but since the previous one is definitely correct, i don't this one is. (it's not that it's not a goal, but it isn't a main focus)
