Answer:
The correct answer is a. Rational decision-making perspective.
Explanation:
The rational model pursues the constitution of a process of choice among alternatives to maximize the benefits of the organization. It includes a broad definition of the problem, an exhaustive collection and analysis of the data, as well as a careful evaluation of the alternatives. Andreu, in the year (2001), affirms that the criteria for evaluating alternatives are well known and assumes that the generation and exchange of information between individuals is objective and precise. Therefore, the rational decision-making model is based on 3 explicit assumptions:
- All available information related to the alternatives has been obtained.
- These alternatives can be classified according to explicit criteria.
- The selected alternative provides the maximum possible profit for the organization (or for decision makers).
Answer:
The answer to this question is option C. $560
Explanation:
We can let the price of each hollow pine door = d and of each solid oak door = 2d.
Since each pine door = 40, d = 40, and the regular price of each solid oak door is (2)(4) = 80.
With a 25% discount, each solid oak door is 0.75(80) = 60.
So, the six oak doors cost 6 x 60 = 360 dollars, and the five pine doors cost 5 x 40 = 200 dollars. Thus, the total is 560 dollars.
Hence the answer is C
Answer:
1
Db Salaries expenses__4000
Cr Accrued salaries__________4000
Accrued on December 31
Explanation:
Accrued salaries refers to the amount of liability remaining at the end of a reporting period for salaries that have been earned by employees but not yet paid to them.
Weekly payroll 5000
Day payroll 1000
Monday-Thursday 4000
1
Db Salaries expenses__4000
Cr Accrued salaries__________4000
Accrued on December 31
Answer:
A) True
Explanation:
Monumental can discharge the contract by frustration. In order for a contract to be discharged by frustration, four conditions have to occur:
- An unforeseeable event must occur: In this case the zoning changes were unforeseeable.
-
No party is at fault: the zoning board made the changes to the zoning of the land.
- Performance is impossible: there is no reason why an office building should be built in a residential only area.
- The result is radically different than expected: neither Monumental or Champion Builders expected a zoning change to occur.