Answer:
Tariff of 1832
Explanation:
The Tariff of 1832 was enacted to replace the 1828 import tariffs commonly known as Tariffs of Abomination. Most southern states did not like it, but its greatest opposition came from South Carolina since its economy depended greatly in foreign trade. Back then America's largest export was cotton produced by southern states.
Due to South Carolina's extreme opposition, it was replaced by the Compromise Tariff of 1833. This last tariff would gradually decrease the tax rates until they fell back to 1816 levels, which was approximately 20%.
The Nullification Crisis refers to a legal process carried out in South Carolina that determined that federal taxes, specifically import tariffs were unconstitutional and shouldn't apply to them. The problem is that the Supreme Court decides what is unconstitutional or not, not a state court.
Answer: Under the given circumstances , the following would be a positive externality for the global environment:<em><u> </u></em><u><em>Fewer people move from rural to urban areas, reducing urban sprawl.</em></u>
Urban sprawl can lead to several negative externalities such as : pollution, exploitation of natural resources at an exponential rate, unemployment etc.
Therefore, if fewer people move from rural to urban areas, this will reduce urban sprawl and further every other negative externality associated with it.
<u><em>The correct option is (A)</em></u>
Answer:
The insurance expense on the annual income statement for the year ended December 31, 2019 will be D. $337.50
Explanation:
The company paid the $1,350 premium on a three-year insurance policy.
The insurance expense per year = $1,350/3 = $450
From April 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019, the company had bought the insurance for 9 months.
The insurance expense on the annual income statement for the year ended December 31, 2019 = $450/12x9 = $337.5
The answer is total compensation.
