All categories

2 years ago

.What does a reviewer do during peer-review?

Biology

2 answers:

den301095 [7]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

A peer review is a process of analysis of the research product by the person other than the one who has conducted the research. Such a person exhibit knowledge of the subject or topic in which the research has been conducted. The reviewer reads the written document related to the research, rectifies the mistakes and gives opinion for the betterment of the research outcome.

Gnesinka [82]2 years ago

4 0

They check for mistakes and bias

You might be interested in

You are given a 1 liter bacterial culture in exponential stage of growth. The generation time of the bacteria is known to be 30

nydimaria [60]

Answer:

Option-A

Explanation:

A bacteria divides by binary fission which divides a parent bacteria into the two daughter cells and generation time refers to the average time difference between two consecutive generations.

The bacterial cell grows by the exponential function that is by $2^{number of generation}$ x initial population of bacteria.

In the given question,

Initial population

the initial population of bacteria - 2x 10³ per ml

So per liter, the bacterial population will be 2 x 10 ⁶

Generation time

1 generation time of bacteria is 30 min.

so 5 hours will have-   $\frac{300}{30}$ = 10 generations

New bacterial population

Using formula $2^{number of generation}$ x initial population of bacteria

$2^{10}$ x (2 x 10⁶)

= 1048 x (2 x 10⁶)

2048 x 10⁶

Thus, Option-A is the correct answer.

4 0

2 years ago

T/F Cancer is a failure of the cell to regulate the cell cycle.

adelina 88 [10]

Ture

Sound about right

8 0

2 years ago

a cool region underneath cloud cover will have ____ a region with no cloud cover. A. a higher temperature than. B. the same pres

kirill [66]

The same pressure as. C. a higher pressure than

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the purpose of scientific argumentation?

RUDIKE [14]

<h3>Answer;</h3>

Evaluate the validity and reliability of processes and findings.

<h3>Explanation;</h3>

Scientific argumentation is a stage of scientific inquiry in which scientists make claims, based on observable evidence, and then clarify with justification of the evidence as relevant to the claims.
It is therefore, an important part of scientific inquiry as it aims evaluate the validity and reliability of processes and findings. Scientific claims from an investigation should be based on evidence that is justified based on the claims.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the safest way to carry a microscope? one student should hold onto the base and one student should grasp the arm. two st

Darina [25.2K]

C.)Place one hand under the base and grasp the arm with the other hand.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers