Answer:
B
Explanation:
The narrator says he was mystical, he only says horror when it comes to describing the whale because he had to be specific, almost like he didn't know how to describe him.
cause-and-effect reasoning is mostly persuasive as it helps answer the question on <em>'how' </em> <em>one person, thing, or event causing another thing or event to occur </em> or <em>'why' something happens </em>making a statement objective and rational rather than a blind assertion/affirmation.
Hope this answer helps you, have a great day!
It is piled high because of sticky (more viscous) lava
An "iamb" is a word or set of words that goes 'da-DAH', like "my KNEE",
or "your FACE", or "his DOG", or "come HERE".
Many poems have the same rhythm (beat) in each line, and there are different
rhythms they can have. I can show you that, if I take a poem you know, and
recite it first with the correct beat, and then with the wrong beat.
Here's the correct beat:
MAH-ree HAD a LIT-tle LAMB its FLEECE was WHITE as SNOW.
For the wrong beat, let's use 'iambs' like I explained up above:
ma-REE had A lit-TLE lamb ITS fleece WAS white AS snow.
If a poem is in the rhythm of "iambic tetrameter", then each line is
made out iambs, and there are 4 of them ("tetra") in each line.
Now I have to try and find an example for you. Thank you very much.
I'll make one up. Remember, an iamb goes 'da-DAH":
my DOG came IN-to SCHOOL one DAY
and CHASED the HAM-sters ALL a-ROUND.
the PRIN-ci-PLE came IN-to CLASS
and TOOK my DOG down TO the POUND.
(The dog 'pound' is the shelter for stray dogs.)
Answer:
D). A shoplifter like you could never have a wise opinion.
Explanation:
Non Sequitur fallacy is elucidated as the fallacy in which the conclusion is not logically supported by its premises. It makes the argument flawed and affects the validity of the argument.
The last argument involves a non sequitur fallacy as the conclusion 'you could never have a wise opinion' does not follow the premises 'a shopkeeper like you.' <u>The reason fails to justify the conclusion logically which makes the argument flawed and affects its validity</u>. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
