Answer:
The CPA rebuts the allegations
Explanation:
The Securities Act of 1933 requires that investors receive financial and other significant information regarding any and all securities being sold publicly and prohibits deceit, misrepresentations, and other fraud in the sale of securities. Therefore, since there was material misstatement or omission in the financial statements, the only chance the CPA has is if they rebut the allegations. Meaning that they provide actual evidence, such as physical statements or witnesses that contradict or nullify the evidence that is being presented against them regarding the material misstatement or omission
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Milling work in progress A/c Dr $9,000
Cutting work in progress A/c Dr $15,000
To Manufacturing overhead A/c $24,000
(Being overhead allocation is recorded)
The milling work in progress is computed by
= Milling department machine-hours × $ overhead rate
= 1,800 machine hours × $5
= $9,000
And, The cutting work in progress is computed by
= Cutting department machine-hours × $ overhead rate
= 3,000 machine hours × $5
= $15,000
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its 2346
Explanation:
might be wrong considering Edge loves to move answers around. <em>yes they do that....</em>
Answer: $603,500
Explanation:
Ending inventory in 2014;
= Ending inventory balance 2013 + (( * 100) - ending inventory 2013)) * Price index 2014/100
= 550,000 + (() - 550,000)) * 107/100
= $603,500
Answer:
Imagine you have just flicked a lighter. If you don’t see the flame, you will naturally try a second time. If after the second attempt it does not strike a flame, you will repeat your action again and again until it does. Eventually, you’ll see the flame and you’ll know that your lighter works. But what if it doesn’t? How long are you going to flick the lighter until you decide to give up?
Our everyday life is full of such decision dilemmas and uncertainty. We constantly have to choose between options, whether we make the most ordinary decisions – should I continue flicking this lighter? – or life-changing choices – should I leave this relationship? We can either keep on doing what we are already used to do, or risk unexplored options that could turn out much more valuable.
Some people are naturally inclined to take more chances, while others prefer to hold on to what they know best. Yet being curious and explorative is fundamental for humans and animals to find out how best to harvest resources such as water, food or money. While looking at the Belém Tower – a symbol of Portugal’s great maritime discoveries – from my office window, I often wonder what drives people to explore the unknown and what goes on in their brains when weighing pros and cons for trying something new. To answer these questions, together with Dr. Zachary Mainen and his team of neuroscientists, we investigate how the brain deals with uncertainty when making decisions.
Explanation:
It is well known that the decision-making process results from communication between the prefrontal cortex (working memory) and hippocampus (long-term memory). However, there are other regions of the brain that play essential roles in making decisions, but their exact mechanisms of action still are unknown.