A theorem can be proven (from axioms or prior theorems), using logic.
A hypothesis can be supported by evidence. The more evidence in support of the hypothesis, the more likely the hypothesis is to be correct. However, you’re always at the mercy of contrary evidence appearing in the future, to reduce the likelihood or even invalidate a hypothesis.
A (mathematical) proof suffers no such vulnerability to future evidence, as long as you hold the axioms of the theory to be true, and as long as there was no flaw in the construction of the proof.
The answer to this is Helium :) it's in the farthest right columb and is a noble gas.
please mark as brainliest!
RT = R1 R2/ R1 + R2
R1 = R2 = 2k ohm
RT = R/2 = 2k/2 = 1k ohm
The tension in the rope B is determined as 10.9 N.
<h3>Vertical angle of cable B</h3>
tanθ = (6 - 4)/(5 - 0)
tan θ = (2)/(5)
tan θ = 0.4
θ = arc tan(0.4) = 21.8 ⁰
<h3>Angle between B and C</h3>
θ = 21.8 ⁰ + 21.8 ⁰ = 43.6⁰
Apply cosine rule to determine the tension in rope B;
A² = B² + C² - 2BC(cos A)
B = C
A² = B² + B² - (2B²)(cos A)
A² = 2B² - 2B²(cos 43.6)
A² = 0.55B²
B² = A²/0.55
B² = 65.3/0.55
B² = 118.73
B = √(118.73)
B = 10.9 N
Thus, the tension in the rope B is determined as 10.9 N.
Learn more about tension here: brainly.com/question/24994188
#SPJ1