Answer:D
Explanation: :) trust me look at meh face
Answer:
a) Zero coupon bond does not pay periodical interest and formula to compute the value of a zero-coupon bond:
Value = Face Value / (1 +Yield / 2) ** Years to Maturity * 2
b) Interest deduction
After 1 year bond value from the above equation is 437.08
437.08 - 411.99 = 25.09
In the 14th year bond value from the above equation is 942.60
1000 - 942.60 = 57.40
c) Straight Line Method
Total Interest Paid = 1000 - 411.99
= 588.01
For yearly calculation
588.01 / 15 = 39.21
Further computation is done in the image below.
Answer:
option d) approximately 84%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Mean, m = $92
Standard deviation, s = $13
Now,
we have to calculate percentage of homes will have a monthly utility bill of more than $79 i.e P(X > 79)
also,
P( X > 79) = 1 - P( X < 79)
Z-score for (X = 79 ) =
Z =
or
Z = -1
From the standard Z value vs P table, we have
P( Z < -1 ) = 0.1587
Thus,
P( X < 79) = P( Z < -1 ) = 0.1587
therefore,
P(X > 79) = 1 - 0.1587
or
P(X > 79) = 0.8413
or
= 0.8413 × 100%
= 84.13%
Hence,
option d) approximately 84%
Answer: $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator.
Explanation:
If the MPC = 0.75 and there is no investment accelerator or crowding out, then a $115 billion increase in the government expenditures would result in the shift in the aggregate demand curve right by:
= $115 billion ÷ (1 - 0.75)
= $115 billion ÷ 0.25
= $115 billion × 1/0.25
= $115 billion / 0.25
= $460 billion.
Therefore, there'll be a shift in the aggregate demand curve right by $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator
The correct answer is C,
A good is said to have an inelastic supply if the suppliers did not have any choice than producing it even though the cost of production is high and the buyers did not have any choice than buying it even though it is expensive.
No one can do without shoes, even if they are expensive, we still need to buy them.