Answer:
19.07%
Explanation:
The computation of the total compound return over the 3 years is shown below:
= (1 + investment percentage earned in first year) × (1 + investment percentage earned in second year) × (1 + investment percentage loss in second year)
= (1 + 0.35) × (1 + 0.40) × (1 - 0.37)
= 1.35 × 1.40 × 0.63
= 1.1907
= 19.07%
Answer:
In the explanation is a short point of view about the cyber defense and the perimeter oriented posture.
Explanation:
To begin with, the concept known as "Cibersecurity" refers to the process of protection of computer systems and everything related to them like softwares, hardwares or any electronic data that could be harmful and sensitive for the company. The reason why this type of practice has been rising up the last years is due to the fact that the "internet of things" has been growing up as well and everyday the companies need to protect their information more and more. Moreover, the "perimeter-oriented" security posture implicates the focus on the external networks as being bad and on the other side the internal networks as being good and stable. So the reason why the companies should consider the cyber defense important is because they need to protect all the information that could be use against them.
Increased
It’s a positive number
Answer:
The auditor is entitled to collect the audit fee and is not liable for $90 000.
Explanation:
Ace & King did their job in a competent way, the fact that the company's controller was doing something illegal is not their responsibility. External auditors work with the information that is given to them and their job is limited to analyzing them and making their conclusions about them.
In this case, the controller was the person responsible for giving the information to the auditing company, so he had the chance to direct their conclusions. An external auditor is not responsible for what happens inside a firm, and if someone steals money or assets, he/she is responsible for it.
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
According to the BrandZ model, "Bonded" consumers at the lower levels of the pyramid build stronger relationships with and spend more on the brand than those at the top. This is a false statement. True statement is, according to the BrandZ model, "Bonded" consumers at the top level of the pyramid build stronger relationships with and spend more on the brand than those at the top. This bonding is created in the very last step which is the ultimate result of the
Presence
Relevance
Performance
&
Advantage step, therefore the order becomes this:
Presence
Relevance
Performance
Advantage
&
Bonding.
