Explanation:
Wavelength = speed of light/frequency
Answer is
Answer: the minimal force that you need to apply to move the bureau is F = 198.45N
Explanation:
If you want to move an object, you need to apply a force that is bigger than the force of the statical friction.
The force of statical friction can be written as.
Ff = k*N
where k is the coefficient of static friction, in this case, k = 0.45, and N is the normal force between the object and the surface.
In this case, the normal force is the weight of the bedroom bureau, this is:
N = m*g = 45kg*9.8m/s^2 = 441N
Then the force is:
Fr = 0.45*441N = 198.45N
This means that the minimal force that you need to apply to move the bureau is F = 198.45N
and after this point, the force of friction will work wit the kinetic coefficient of friction, that usually is smaller than the statical one.
<span>Using conservation of energy and momentum you can solve this question. M_l = mass of linebacker
M_ h = mass of halfback
V_l = velocity of linebacker
V_h = velocity of halfback
So for conservation of momentum,
rho = mv
M_l x V_li + M_h x V_hi = M_l x V_lf + M_h x V_hf
For conservation of energy (kinetic)
E_k = 1/2mv^2/ 1/2mV_li^2 + 1/2mV_{hi}^2 = 1/2mV_{lf}^2 + 1/2mV_{hf}^2
Where i and h stand for initial and final values.
We are already told the masses, \[M_l = 110kg\] \[M_h = 85kg\] and the final velocities \[V_{fi} = 8.5ms^{-1}\] and \[V_{ih} = 7.2ms^{-1} </span>
Light travels in electromagnetic waves in the form of photons. What do photons travel in? Can a frequency have weight? Carry weight? According to Einstien a photon with energy proportional to its frequency basically explains ultraviolet light(among other things), so does that mean light travels within a "larger" version of itself?
We know that light doesn't need a medium through which to travel because the speed of light is experimentally constant: independent of the movement of the source or detector or the direction in which it travels.
Light contrasts with sound, which travels through the air (or some other material medium). If you're stationary with respect to the air, then the speed of sound is the same in all directions. But if you're moving with respect to the air, the speed of sound will be the same in all directions relative to the air---which means that sound coming up in front of you will seem faster and sound catching up to you from behind will seem slower.
If light were a disturbance in a medium, it would exhibit the same behaviour. But light never does---its speed is the same under all circumstances. So it does you no good to postulate an aether. You can still do it, but it makes the theory more complicated than necessary. The only reason to postulate an aether is that you're uncomfortable with the idea of waves not needing a medium. But our modern understanding of quantum mechanics is that all kinds of particles have a wavelike nature, so, if you accept that matter can travel through empty space, you should have no problem accepting the same for light.
so it's true
C. has to be right, also its the only one that makes sense.
Hope this helps!
