Answer:
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= $2,080 unfavorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Standard= 3 hours of direct labor per unit
The standard labor cost is $13 per hour.
During August, Hassock produced 9,000 units and used 27,160 hours
<u>To calculate the direct labor efficiency variance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= (Standard Quantity - Actual Quantity)*standard rate
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= (3*9,000 - 27,160)*13
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= $2,080 unfavorable
Answer: 2,200 units.
Explanation:
The complete exercise is:
A manufacturer shipped units of a certain product to two locations. The equation above shows the total shipping cost T, in dollars, for shipping c units to the closer location and shipping f units to the farther location. If the total shipping cost was $47,000 and 3,000 units were shipped to the farther location, how many units were shipped to the closer location?
Given the following equation:
You know that "T" is the total shipping cost (in dollars), "c" is the number of units shipped to the closer location and "f" is the number of units shipped to the farther location.
Based on the information given in the exercise, you can identify that, in this case:
Then, knowing those values, you need to substitute them into the given equation:
And finally, you must solve for "c" in order to calculate the number of units that were shipped to the closer location.
You get that this is:
i ant good but my teacher is cool and told my the answer
,Answer:
-Marcus is owed something by Super Corp because he relied reasonably and to his detriment on Super Corp's offer.
Explanation:
Employment contracts can be written, oral, or implied and each of these are binding to some extent.
In the given instance it is required that employment should be written in the state where Super Corp operates.
So Marcus will not be able to compel them to give him a job as the offer was made and accepted orally.
However the offer resulted in him quitting his current job, which paid $75,000 a year, and heading to the state where Super Corp was headquartered.
He relied on the offer to his detriment of losing his current job, so Super Corp owes him for the damages incurred