What Aidan can do to improve his delivery of his extemporaneous speech on diversity in literature is the following:
- Since extemporaneous speeches do not allow for much preparation, Aidan will need to change his delivery in order to make it more interesting.
- He should try to speak to the audience, not at them - that is, he should make the speech more conversational. If the audience thinks he is talking directly to them, they will pay more attention.
- Including anecdotes or even some light jokes may also help bright up the general mood or make the experience more enjoyable.
- Extemporaneous speeches are given in competitions where the speakers are evaluated for the quality of their delivery.
- Speakers are given some time to prepare on a topic, usually about 30 minutes. Then, they must speak for about 7 minutes on that subject.
- The style of the speech should reflect spontaneity, which should make it more conversational, less formal.
- In Aidan's case, if the conversational style is not enough to keep the audience interested, perhaps he could try and change the mood a bit.
- Most subjects allow for the use of personal anecdotes. If he can tell a funny or compelling story, he will most likely grab people's attention.
Learn more about the topic here:
brainly.com/question/11120532
Answer:
The option that best describes how Anaya effectively uses rhetoric in the excerpt to convince readers that his conclusion is justified is:
B) Anaya establishes his credibility as a published Chicano author by discussing his career experience.
Explanation:
Rhetoric concerns the use of devices and strategies to convince the audience of your opinion or perspective. A commonly efficient way to do so is by establishing your own credibility concerning the subject. That is what Anaya is doing in this excerpt. He gets to talk about language and culture in American literature, and be taken seriously while doing it, due to his credibility as a published Chicano author. His life and career are devoted and dependent on this subject, which gives him some sort of authority to discuss it.
The detail that shows how Pola's character is using historical context is that the play takes place in the 1920s, Neville," replied Pola irritably.
<h3>What is a character?</h3>
It should be noted that a character simply means the trait that's attributed to an individual in a literary work.
In this case, Pola's character is using historical context to develop the characters in the script of her play. This was illustrated as stated things that occured in the past.
Learn more about characters on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
Ok
20 word limit sucks, so I’ll just say that I hope you’re doing okay. Stay safe out there, bro.
