No they won’t be.Consider the linear combination (1)(u – v) + (1) (v – w) + (-1)(u – w).This will add to 0. But the coefficients aren’t all 0.Therefore, those vectors aren’t linearly independent.
You can try an example of this with (1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), and (0, 0, 1), the usual basis vectors of R3.
That method relied on spotting the solution immediately.If you couldn’t see that, then there’s another approach to the problem.
We know that u, v, w are linearly independent vectors.So if au + bv + cw = 0, then a, b, and c are all 0 by definition.
Suppose we wanted to ask whether u – v, v – w, and u – w are linearly independent.Then we’d like to see if there are non-zero coefficients in the linear combinationd(u – v) + e(v – w) + f(u – w) = 0, where d, e, and f are scalars.
Distributing, we get du – dv + ev – ew + fu – fw = 0.Then regrouping by vector: (d + f)u + (-d +e)v + (-e – f)w = 0.
But now we have a linear combo of u, v, and w vectors.Therefore, all the coefficients must be 0.So d + f = 0, -d + e = 0, and –e – f = 0. It turns out that there’s a free variable in this solution.Say you let d be the free variable.Then we see f = -d and e = d.
Then any solution of the form (d, e, f) = (d, d, -d) will make (d + f)u + (-d +e)v + (-e – f)w = 0 a true statement.
Let d = 1 and you get our original solution. You can let d = 2, 3, or anything if you want.
Answer:
10.5
Step-by-step explanation:
v=158
l×w×h =158
l×5×3=158
l×15=158
L =158÷15=10.5
Check the picture below.
since chords NQ and MP cross the center of the circle at R, that means that those two chords are diametrical chords and the angles made by both are vertical angles and thus twin angles, namely both are 18° as you see in the picture, so the angle NMP in magenta is really 162° + 18° + 18° = 198°, and we know the radius NR is 8.
![\textit{arc's length}\\\\ s=\cfrac{r\pi \theta }{180}~~ \begin{cases} r=radius\\ \theta =\stackrel{degrees}{angle}\\[-0.5em] \hrulefill\\ r=8\\ \theta =198 \end{cases}\implies s=\cfrac{(8)\pi (198)}{180}\implies s\approx 27.6](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctextit%7Barc%27s%20length%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20s%3D%5Ccfrac%7Br%5Cpi%20%5Ctheta%20%7D%7B180%7D~~%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20r%3Dradius%5C%5C%20%5Ctheta%20%3D%5Cstackrel%7Bdegrees%7D%7Bangle%7D%5C%5C%5B-0.5em%5D%20%5Chrulefill%5C%5C%20r%3D8%5C%5C%20%5Ctheta%20%3D198%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%5Cimplies%20s%3D%5Ccfrac%7B%288%29%5Cpi%20%28198%29%7D%7B180%7D%5Cimplies%20s%5Capprox%2027.6)
Answer:
slope is undefined
Step-by-step explanation:
Calculate the slope m using the slope formula
m = (y₂ - y₁ ) / (x₂ - x₁ )
with (x₁, y₁ ) = (9, 2) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (9, - 5)
m = 
= 
Since division by zero is undefined then the slope is undefined.
This indicates that the line is vertical.
Answer:
310339.1 in^3
Step-by-step explanation:
Volume=4/3*pi*r^3
Volume=4/3*pi*42^3
Volume=4/3*pi*74088
Volume=98784*pi
Volume=310339.0887
So the volume is about 310339.1 in^3
