Explanation:
The long-running debate between the ‘rational design’ and ‘emergent process’ schools of strategy formation has involved caricatures of firms' strategic planning processes, but little empirical evidence of whether and how companies plan. Despite the presumption that environmental turbulence renders conventional strategic planning all but impossible, the evidence from the corporate sector suggests that reports of the demise of strategic planning are greatly exaggerated. The goal of this paper is to fill this empirical gap by describing the characteristics of the strategic planning systems of multinational, multibusiness companies faced with volatile, unpredictable business environments. In-depth case studies of the planning systems of eight of the world's largest oil companies identified fundamental changes in the nature and role of strategic planning since the end of the 1970s. The findings point to a possible reconciliation of ‘design’ and ‘process’ approaches to strategy formulation. The study pointed to a process of planned emergence in which strategic planning systems provided a mechanism for coordinating decentralized strategy formulation within a structure of demanding performance targets and clear corporate guidelines. The study shows that these planning systems fostered adaptation and responsiveness, but showed limited innovation and analytical sophistication
This is mainly opinionated, and since I'm young I may be wrong.
I say it's good to motivate them because then they will do a better job at their task and will make you seem like a good boss/person, especially if it's a decent pay that will keep them being able to live. With the motivation, they might even remember more things (Such as: If you work at a gas station, you remember to upsell people when a deal is going on, whereas unmotivated people forget or just don't want to do it and be lazy). It's the same effect of giving a kid a piece of candy for being good, doing chores, or getting a harder question right.
Answer:
A. -0.80
B. 2.20
Explanation:
A. Calculation for your net profit on the option if Pfizer’s stock price does not change over the life of the option
Net profit per share=max(53-55,0)-0.80
Net profit per share=0-0.80
Net profit per share=-0.80
Therefore your net profit on the option if Pfizer’s stock price does not change over the life of the option is -0.80
b. Calculation for your net profit on the option if Pfizer’s stock price falls to $50 and you exercise the option
Net profit per share
=max(53-50,0)-0.80
Net profit per share=3-0.80
Net profit per share=2.20
Therefore your net profit on the option if Pfizer’s stock price falls to $50 and you exercise the option is 2.20
A product line is a group of related products produced by one manufacturer they use product lines to gauge trend a find out which markets to target they use whatever is being sold the most and go from there
Trello!
it should be TRUE!
have a nice day :D
:>
