Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean temperature is different from 42 deg
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information, we are being told that:
The manufacturer of a refrigerator system for beer kegs produces refrigerators that are supposed to maintain a true mean temperature, μ, of 42°F
i. e mean μ = 42
The owner of the brewery does not agree with the refrigerator manufacturer, and claims he can prove that the true mean temperature is incorrect.
Assuming that a hypothesis test of the claim has been conducted and that the conclusion is to reject the null hypothesis, state the conclusion in nontechnical terms.
From above;
The null and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as:
Here , the hypothesis test of the claim is the alternative hypothesis.
The conclusion based on the decision rule: is to reject the null hypothesis
∴
The conclusion in non technical terms is that :
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean temperature is different from 42 deg
Digit in ones place- 8
Digit in tenths place- 2
The inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
<h3>What do you mean by inverse?</h3>
Inverse of the statement means that explain the condition in reverse way or vice versa.
Since, M is the midpoint of PQ, then PM is congruent to QM.
Proving in reverse way, let m be the point between P and Q the distance M from P is equal to the distance from M to Q. Which implies that M lies as the mid of the P and Q.
Thus, the inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
Learn more about inverse here:
brainly.com/question/5338106
#SPJ1
Answer:D. x=10
Step-by-step explanation: