Answer:
Im pretty sure the answer is false
Explanation:
this is because when investing you want to get as much money as possible so you would buy it super cheap and sell it high
Answer:
His opportunity cost a graduation was$50,000 and eight years later is $2 million
Explanation:
His opportunity cost at the time of graduation is $50,000 as he has 2 choices at that time, either playing soccer or coaching. And as he has been playing football for eight years which implying that he gave up the coaching option. The opportunity cost was therefore $50,000, which is a yearly amount of coaching.
in the same way his opportunity cost is $2 million after 8 years because he has two alternatives to play soccer and create films. And as he gave up the possibility to play football. Therefore, the opportunity cost for playing soccer was $2 million, which is the sum he gets.
The bank would want to know the person’s credit history so the bank knows the person will repay the loan.
Answer:
Standard of value.
Explanation:
When money serves as a common denominator for measuring the exchange rates among goods and services, it performs as a standard of value.
Standard of value is an agreed-upon worth for a transaction in a country's medium of exchange, such as the U.S. dollar or Mexican peso. A standard of value allows all merchants and economic entities to set uniform prices for goods and services
Answer and Explanation:
By publishing the "List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor" the American government is able to raise awareness among the population that, although child labor is something inconceivable in American society, it still happens with great intensity in various places around the world. This allows the population to become aware of this situation and to stop buying products produced by companies that finance and allow child labor to happen. When they stop using these products, companies suffer a decrease in demand, which can cause significant changes in the production and in the lives of children who need to work.
While consumer pressure at companies that allow child labor is effective, pressure from political and commercial authorities is more effective in bringing about change and ensuring the protection of children, as these authorities can promote severe punishments for those who allow this to happen.
