Answer: A & C
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
HL is Hypotenuse-Leg
A) the hypotenuse from ΔABC ≡ the hypotenuse from ΔFGH
a leg from ΔABC ≡ a leg from ΔFGH
Therefore HL Congruency Theorem can be used to prove ΔABC ≡ ΔFGH
B) a leg from ΔABC ≡ a leg from ΔFGH
the other leg from ΔABC ≡ the other leg from ΔFGH
Therefore LL (not HL) Congruency Theorem can be used.
C) the hypotenuse from ΔABC ≡ the hypotenuse from ΔFGH
at least one leg from ΔABC ≡ at least one leg from ΔFGH
Therefore HL Congruency Theorem can be used to prove ΔABC ≡ ΔFGH
D) an angle from ΔABC ≡ an angle from ΔFGH
the other angle from ΔABC ≡ the other angle from ΔFGH
AA cannot be used for congruence.
Answer:
y = 3
x = 1
y = 1.5
x = 2
Step-by-step explanation:
For the first x point, look at the graph where x is 0. When x is 0, y is 3. So the first one is 3. For the second one, there is a point on the graph where y is 4. Where y is 4, x is 1, so you the second answer is 1. For the third one, find the y point where x is -1. At the x value, -1, y is 1.5. For the last one, where y is 5, x is 2.
Answer:
Option (2)
Step-by-step explanation:
x = 1 is represented by a solid point on a number line.
x > 1 is represented by an arrow starting from x = 1 towards infinity
If we mix both the properties, x ≥ will be represented by an arrow starting from a solid point at x = 1 and moving towards the values greater than one.
From the options given,
Arrow mentioned in Option (2) will be the correct representation of the inequality.
The first one is your answer because if you plug into the cal it shows the x and y table and it shows that the first one is correct.
The LCD is 30. The fractions would be 9/30 and -8/30
