Answer:
true
Explanation:
true<em> </em><em>yh </em><em>no </em><em>chang</em><em>e</em><em>s </em><em>true</em><em> </em><em>all </em><em>the</em><em> way</em>
Answer:
If negative externalities pop up in a market, the equilibrium is higher than the efficient output.
Thus when it comes to the government rectification regarding the side effects of that commercial , activity, if the amount of bags is (1) then the new equilibrium would be: <em>p*= $17</em>
Answer: Yes contract has been formed.
Explanation: According to the Uniform Electronic Transaction Act (UETA), electronic transactions are just as binding as transactions made on hardcopy documents. Moreover signatures made electronically reinforces the validity of these elctronic documents.
In the scenario the actual signature was signed on a hard copy by the seller, but it was then faxed back to the listing agent. This faxed copy, showing the faxed signature, is an electronic document that confirms the existence of the contract in accordance with the UETA. This faxed signature is as enforceable as an ink signature.
The entry for this transaction would be this:
Land 1,827,000
Ordinary shares 1,827,000
#
<span>The market value of the shares on </span>this transaction<span> does not affect the recording of this transaction. If the share has no par value, the stated value should be used. Stated value is a value assigned by the company to its stock for the purpose of accounting and it does not have any relation with the market value of the shares. Since stated value is not given in this problem, we should record the entire amount of the land exchanged in this transaction to the "Ordinary shares" account.</span>
