Answer:
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the average room price is significantly different from $108.50
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is n = 64
The average price is
The population standard deviation is
The level of significance is
The population mean is
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as
=>
=>
From the z table the area under the normal curve to the left corresponding to 1.75 is
Generally p-value is mathematically represented as
=>
=>
From the values obtained we see that hence
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the average room price is significantly different from $108.50
#22. We are given that y = 1/4. So, we want to plug this value into the expression 15/y:
15/(1/4)
When you divide by a fraction, you should follow the rule “flip the guy and multiply”. Basically, 15/(1/4) = 15 * 4 = 60.
The answer for #22 is (D).
#23. We can use a proportion:
(The shaded area)/(entire circle area) = (360 - 60)/360
But, we don’t have to find the areas of the region and circle; we can just solve the fraction:
(360 - 60)/360 = 300/360 = 30/36 = 5/6
The answer for #23 is (A).
Answer:
No it is not
Step-by-step explanation:
The median is 84200
The mean is 85300
Low income is 65100
High income is 103400
From this information, we can see a skewed data. The mean would not be a good estimate value. Rather the center (median) would be more appropriate.
When we calculate the middle value for this data
65100+103400 = 168500/2 = 84250
84250 is closer to the median score of 84200. The median is best in the presence of outliers.
Answer:
81.2 feet (nearest tenth)
Step-by-step explanation: