Answer:
She should have substituted y = 17 - 2x in the first equation
Step-by-step explanation:
3x + 4y = 33
2x + y = 17
y = 17 - 2x
3x + 4(17 - 2x) = 33
3x + 68 - 8x = 33
5x = 35
x = 7
y = 17 - 2(7)
y = 3
x = 7, y = 3
Only one solution
It was about 17.4%
======================================================================
% error=
actual value-estimated value
Then divide that by actual value
Given : f(x)= 3|x-2| -5
f(x) is translated 3 units down and 4 units to the left
If any function is translated down then we subtract the units at the end
If any function is translated left then we add the units with x inside the absolute sign
f(x)= 3|x-2| -5
f(x) is translated 3 units down
subtract 3 at the end, so f(x) becomes
f(x)= 3|x-2| -5 -3
f(x) is translated 4 units to the left
Add 4 with x inside the absolute sign, f(x) becomes
f(x)= 3|x-2 + 4| -5 -3
We simplify it and replace f(x) by g(x)
g(x) = 3|x + 2| - 8
a= 3, h = -2 , k = -8
Answer:
x: -5, -3, 0, 1, 4
y:-23, -15, -3, 1, 13 for the function.
x:-23, -15, -3, 1, 13
y: -5, -3, 0, 1, 4 for the inverse.
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that if we have the function f(x) = y, then the inverse of f(x) (let's call it g(x)) is such that:
g(y) = x.
now we have
y=4x-3
y=(1/4)x+3/4
The only table that works for our first function is:
x: -5, -3, 0, 1, 4
y:-23, -15, -3, 1, 13
You can see this by replacing the values of x and see if the value of y also coincides.
Then, using the fact that the other table must be for the inverse, we should se a table with the same values, but where the values of x and y are interchanged.
The second table is that one:
x:-23, -15, -3, 1, 13
y: -5, -3, 0, 1, 4
