In fact, both Amanda's and Stephen's profs are correct; they are just using different supplementary angles. Amanda's is using the supplementary angles <span>∠1 and ∠4, and</span> ∠3 and ∠4, whereas Stephen is using ∠1 and ∠2, and <span>∠2 and ∠3.</span><span> </span>Please check the picture to visualize this more effectively.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide
This question is nasty. It sounds like you should be finding area of the figure you see. I'll do that first, although I don't think it's the right answer. (But it might be).
Area Trapezoid = (b1 + b2) * h / 2
b1 = 8
b2 = 12
h = 5
Area Trapezoid = (8 + 12 ) * 5 / 2
Area Trapezoid = 20 * 5/2
Area = 50 square feet.
The problem is that no lumber yard will cut that for you without charging you. The practical answer is 12 * 5 = 60 square feet is what you will have to buy. Then you cut out the triangles for yourself.
First you use Pythagorean theorem to find LO is square root of 194(13^2 + 5^2)=13.9. Then use the same method to find OM (194+13^2=363, square root of 363 is 19.1) and get that OM is 19.1
Answer:
no, it cannot
Step-by-step explanation:
a difference of square is: a² - b² = (a - b)(a + b)
looking at the expression (5z+3)(-5z-3), we see that it does not fit the criteria of the breakdown of a perfect square, as (-5z-3) has a negative <em>a</em> term (-5z)
if we FOILed (5z+3)(-5z-3) out, we would get:
-25z² - 30z - 9, which is not a difference of squares
