<h2>
Explanation:</h2><h2>
</h2>
The complete question is shown below. As you can see, we know that:
Shapes are congruent if you can turn one into the other by moving, rotating or flipping. If any two triangles have matching side lengths, they're not necessarily congruent. The same happens if they have two matching side lengths, but If triangles have three matching side lengths, then they must be congruent. This is is known as the Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS). Since in this problem corresponding sides measures the same, therefore we can say that the postulate that applies is:
B. Congruent - SSS
2 times as much.
(In the cereal aisle at Costco they always have 2 boxes a pack)
1.2 8 x 15 percent = 8 x .15 = 1.2
I want to say the first one, but i do not know for sure.
Strange question, as normally we would not calculate the "area of the tire." A tire has a cross-sectional area, true, but we don't know the outside radius of the tire when it's mounted on the wheel.
We could certainly calculate the area of a circle with radius 8 inches; it's
A = πr^2, or (here) A = π (8 in)^2 = 64π in^2.
The circumference of the wheel (of radius 8 in) is C = 2π*r, or 16π in.
The numerical difference between 64π and 16π is 48π; this makes no sense because we cannot compare area (in^2) to length (in).
If possible, discuss this situatio with your teacher.
