Answer:
it is not linear
Step-by-step explanation:
Linear function means that same increments in x yield uniform increments in y.
First 2 lines: x grows from -5 to 0, so increment in x is 5. For said interval, y grows from 3 to 7, so increment in y is 4.
Then, x grows from 0 to 5, so increment in x is again 5. Now, for the same increase of x, y grows from 7 to 10, so increment now in y is 3.
In the first "5" interval of x, y grew 4, and in the second "5" interval of x y grew 3 ⇒ it is not linear.
The function would have been linear, if last y value had been 11.
7.95 ÷ 1.06 = $7.50
This works as by dividing 7.95 by the percentage multiplier 1.06 it will give you the original amount.
An alternative method is to find out what 100% (7.95) is, then divide by 10 to find 10% and then divide by 10 again to find 1% and then multiply the 1% by 6 and subtracting the answer from 7.95.
Answer:
15 units per unit
Step-by-step explanation:
From the graph we can easily tell that y increases from 0 to 15 as x increases from 2 to 3.
Thus, the average rate of change of f(x) on the interval [2, 3] is:
1 15 - 0 15 units
--------- * ----------- = -------------- = 15 units (rise) per unit (run).
3 - 2 1 1
Answer:
<h2><u>
10</u></h2><h2><u>
4</u></h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine how much a decimal was multiplied, you need to find how many places the decimal moved.
In this case we can see the decimal moved once. How many times the decimal moved can be represented by the zeros in the number. So 10 = 1
100 = 2 1,000 = 3 and it keeps going.
So since the decimal moved 1 time, the answer to question one is 10
Now question 2.
Both 8.4 ÷ 2.1 and 84 ÷ 21 will give the exact same answer. It is just easier to solve. So solve which one is easier for you. I did 84 ÷ 21.
84 ÷ 21 = 4
We can verify our answer by multiplying the the divisor by the quotient
21 * 4 = 84
So 4 is the answer to question 2
