What will happen if government spending increases by $100 billion is:
Real output will increase by a maximum of $400 billion.
<h3>
Government spending</h3>
Using this formula
Multiplier=1/(1-MPC)
Where:
MPC=Marginal propensity to consume =0.75
Let plug in the formula
Multiplier=1/(1-0.75)
Multiplier=1/0.25
Multiplier=4
Increase in GDP= Government spending ×4
Increase in GDP=$400
Inconclusion what will happen if government spending increases by $100 billion is: Real output will increase by a maximum of $400 billion.
Learn more about government spending here:brainly.com/question/25125137
Answer:
(C) Supply chain management should begin with a focus on "the customer".
Explanation:
Supply chain management involves managing all the processes involved in converting raw materials to finished goods and distributing such goods or services to satisfy customer needs.
Processes involved in supply chain management include; sourcing for raw materials, manufacturing, packaging, delivery, customer service.
Before any of these processes are carried out however, an organization must first focus on identifying the needs of its customers and then provide products that add value for the customers and satisfy their needs.
More information is needed to completely answer your question
Answer:
C) a positive result from regulatory and economic environmental forces.
Explanation:
In the short run the whole economy will benefit, more American jobs will be created, consumers will probably get good cars at even lower prices, but on the long run the scenario may not be that good for everyone. If Toyota builds the plant, it will be the result of economic and political pressures, and that is a game that two can play, just ask farmers about the trade deal with China.
On the other hand, this is a type of deja vu (or been there, done that), and it ended up with GM and Chrysler bankrupt and Ford barely surviving. This types of policies were enforced in the 1980s by president Reagan and the famous "Made in the USA" by Bruce Springsteen. Back then Honda had a small factory and Toyota was starting to consider building a plant in the US, Nissan hadn't showed up yet. Fast forward a few years and the only good American vehicles are pickups, the Japanese brands wiped out the rest. The country is full of Camrys, Accords, Civics, Corollas, CRVs and Rav4s. They are great cars, too great for the American car manufacturers to compete against. Who knows, with this type of policies maybe in 10 years the only American car manufacturer left will be Tesla.
This is like playing with fire on top of a fuel truck.
Answer:
A larger industrial and service sector, and a larger number of people working outside of agriculture, can indicate a higher level of industrialization in the economy and vice versa. This means that the size of industrial service and the sector of agriculture employment rate indicates the level of industrialization because if the agriculture employment is higher than the industrial service it means that the country is not fully developed yet and therefore the level of industrialization is lower. But if the industrial service is higher than the agriculture employment that suggests or indicates that the country is developing or developed. For example in the United States the size of the industrial/service sector is much larger than it's agricultural employment and therefore this should suggest that country is much more industrialized or developed and the United States is. In comparison you take a developing country such as Chad and you can see that the agricultural employment is higher than the size of the industrial/service sector and in relation to this you can see that Chad must have a lower level of industrialization and in fact it does.
Explanation:
