This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Which of the following statements is the inverse of "If you do not understand geometry, then you do not know how to reason deductively."?
A. If you reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
B. If you do not reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Answer:
The inverse of that statement is:
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Explanation:
To determine the inverse of a statement, we must negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, the hypothesis is "if you do not understand geometry." It is already a negative sentence, which means its negation is "if you understand geometry." The same goes for the conclusion "then you do not know how to reason deductively." Its negation is "then you [know how to ] reason deductively." Putting them together, we have "If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively." - letter C
Answer:
Explanation:
Seven
Don't get caught believing it is goodest. Good is irregular. Much as I like goodest, the answer is best.
Eight
only if you are using earnest as an adjective, can you have earnest in a comparative sense. earnester would be one choice. A better one in my opinion is more earnest.
Sam is more earnest than Albert.
Sam is earnester than Albert.
The spell check underlines earnester. I think it's right to do so. This is an example of tortured language.
Nine
Narrowest.
Ten
nicer.
Sam is nicer than Albert.
???? On whatever you just wrote
Answer:
dude shut the hell up
Explanation:
1. what u just wrote sounds so annoying
2. that's why u got no friends
