I cant see the rest of the passage, but im taking a guess that it is no.2!
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>
Homer is best known as the author of the Iliad and the Odyssey. He was believed by the ancient Greeks to have been the first and greatest of the epic poets. Author of the first known literature of Europe, he is central to the Western canon.
When he lived, as well as whether he lived at all, is unknown. Herodotus estimates that Homer lived no more than 400 years before his own time, which would place him at around 850 BCE or later. Pseudo-Herodotus estimates that he was born 622 years before Xerxes I placed a pontoon bridge over the Hellespont in 480 BCE, which would place him at 1102 BCE, 168 years after the fall of Troy in 1270 BCE. These two end points are 252 years apart, representative of the differences in dates given by the other sources.
Hope this helped! :)
Answer:
A. Alisha was angry with her brother for criticizing her
Explanation:
This question is about the text "After the Fire", where we learn that Alisha's house has been completely destroyed by fire, requiring her parents to build a new home. Alishia was happy to have a different house and asked her parents to have a room just for her and it was not necessary to share it with her sister. Entretnaot, Alishia's older brother, criticized her for making demands on parents who already had enough concerns, instead of being grateful for the privilege of having a new home. Alishia did not like his brother's criticism and said that he thinks that way because he never had to share a room with anyone.
The author presents characteristics of Guyana's desolate and dismal landscape as a means to appeal to those who depended on the sugar production business in order to maintain themselves economically, and thus, demonstrating the importance of sugar. The whole purpose of the passage is to provide ethical evidence from the sugar scheme's current situation, presenting information about the moral consequences of this business' downfall; in this case, the economic backlash in the country of Guyana.
