1. Wake
2. Slept
3. Didn’t wake
Answer:
The answer to Part A would be Ignorant, as the author goes on to state that his youthful understanding had struggled in vain. If someone is ignorant of something, yet they do not take the time to actually go research or learn about that thing, then they would be struggling in vain because they are selfish and not taking time to research what it is that the other person is saying that they do not understand.
For the answer to Part B, I would say that (Frederick) Douglass' new awareness of how owners maintain control over slaves allows him to better understand how to improve his situation. I say this because he seems to have an awakening/epiphany in the very last line: "I now understood what had been to me a most perplexing difficulty".
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
I believe it's They believe in your power to choice hope this helps :)
Answer:
2ND ONE
Explanation:
HOPE THIS HELPS SORRY FOR CAPS
Basically you have a motif of something eg fruit. Then that motif gets repeated at the end. So even if you have a contrasting beginning and end you can still have like a sentence that repeats cyclically eg ‘humanity can be saved’ or something like that.
A theme or motif or phrase etc that recurs or goes back to the beginning, at the end
cyclical structure is like when when the end situations are in some way the same as they are at the beginning.
It can foreshadow or make you sort of guess what might happen at the end
