Answer:
C. $10,000 positive.
Explanation:
The computation of the amount that should be included is shown below:
= (Option strike price - spot rate) × purchased put options
= ($2.17 - $2.13) × 250,000
= $10,000
As the spot rate is less than the strike price so automatically there is a gain of $10,000
Hence, the option c is correct
Answer:
b. small percentage changes in the price will lead to much larger percentage changes in the quantity demanded.
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand is a measure of how responsive is quantity demanded to change in price. Its formula is given by:
=
= % Change in Quantity Demanded / % Change in Price
So when absolute value is greater than 1, a x percentage change in price will lead to larger than x percentage change in quantity demanded.
<u>Note</u>: Whether the percentage change in quantity demanded will be just a little or very much larger than percentage change in price will depend on how much is larger than 1. But b is the still the best answer among the options.
Answer:
The correct option is B: "The change in Accounts Receivable is a source; The change in Inventory is a use"
Explanation:
However, you will need to look at the asset section as well in order to determine the correct response to this question statement. Depending on how the accounts receivable and inventory changes, you will be able to ascertain which is a source and which is a use. For instance, if the balance in Accounts Receivable and the Inventory has increased, the change is a use. And vice versa.
The reason principled negotiation would be the most suitable strategy in international trade negotiation is because it helps a party to leverage his/her principles of the opponent to win the negotiation.
The principled type of negotiation is recognized as an interest-based class of negotiation.
- A principled negotiation is known as a winner-take-all style of negotiation that is focused on a specific goal of winning.
- In a principled type of negotiation, there are no space for consideration of other party’s needs and requirements.
- However, a principled negotiations is limited because it can fail to settle dispute or conflict even if a parties has the highest intentions and negotiating skills.
In conclusion, the reason principled negotiation would be the most suitable strategy in international trade negotiation is because it helps a party to leverage his/her principles of the opponent to win the negotiation.
Read more about principled negotiation
<em>brainly.com/question/6106694</em>