Answer:
(a) 720 ways
(b) 120 ways
(c) 24 ways
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
--- number of letters
Solving (a): Number of arrangements.
We have:
So, the number of arrangements is calculated as:
This gives:
This gives:
Solving (b): DA as a unit
DA as a unit implies that, we have:
[DA] N C E R
So, we have:
So, the number of arrangements is calculated as:
This gives:
This gives:
Solving (c): NCE as a unit
NCE as a unit implies that, we have:
D A [NCE] R
So, we have:
So, the number of arrangements is calculated as:
This gives:
This gives:
Answer: 20 diagonales
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1. -100
2. -75
3. -18
Step-by-step explanation:
The inflation rate in that country is so high that even with adjusted wages, most workers can barely pay for food and shelter. (Option E).
<h3>What is sentence correction?</h3>
Sentence correction or sentence improvement is a type of grammatical practice where a sentence is given with a word or a phrase that requires grammatical changes or improvement.
Now,
- Since the given sentence is grammatically error-free and has a sensible sentence structure, it does not need any sentence correction.
Hence, Option E is the most suitable, i.e., The inflation rate in that country is so high that even with adjusted wages, most workers can barely pay for food and shelter. (Option E).
To learn more about sentence correction, refer to the link: brainly.com/question/14632568
#SPJ4
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello!
The objective of this experiment is to test if two different foam-expanding agents have the same foam expansion capacity
Sample 1 (aqueous film forming foam)
n₁= 5
X[bar]₁= 4.7
S₁= 0.6
Sample 2 (alcohol-type concentrates )
n₂= 5
X[bar]₂= 6.8
S₂= 0.8
Both variables have a normal distribution and σ₁²= σ₂²= σ²= ?
The statistic to use to make the estimation and the hypothesis test is the t-statistic for independent samples.:
t= ![\frac{(X[bar]_1 - X[bar]_2) - (mu_1 - mu_2)}{Sa*\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2 } } }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%28X%5Bbar%5D_1%20-%20X%5Bbar%5D_2%29%20-%20%28mu_1%20-%20mu_2%29%7D%7BSa%2A%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn_1%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7Bn_2%20%7D%20%7D%20%7D)
a) 95% CI
(X[bar]_1 - X[bar]_2) ± 
*
Sa²= 
= 
= 0.5
Sa= 0.707ç
(4.7-6.9) ± 2.306* 
[-4.78; 0.38]
With a 95% confidence level you expect that the interval [-4.78; 0.38] will contain the population mean of the expansion capacity of both agents.
b.
The hypothesis is:
H₀: μ₁ - μ₂= 0
H₁: μ₁ - μ₂≠ 0
α: 0.05
The interval contains the cero, so the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.
<u>Complete question</u>
a. Find a 95% confidence interval on the difference in mean foam expansion of these two agents.
b. Based on the confidence interval, is there evidence to support the claim that there is no difference in mean foam expansion of these two agents?
